Financial Trade Freedom - Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Financial Trade Freedom - Investing and Stock News
No Result
View All Result
Home News

‘Tariffs suck’: Some Republicans privately celebrate as Supreme Court blocks Trump policy

admin by admin
February 20, 2026
in News
0
‘Tariffs suck’: Some Republicans privately celebrate as Supreme Court blocks Trump policy
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Some Republicans are quietly cheering the Supreme Court’s decision blocking most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Friday, even as it deals a blow to a cornerstone of the commander-in-chief’s foreign policy and economic strategy.

One conservative House GOP lawmaker granted anonymity to speak freely, for example, said they were ‘relieved.’

‘It’s the right result,’ they said. ‘I am already seeing messages of relief and approval from other members of the Republican conference, as well. I expect that even more will express that relief. This helps to ensure Congress keeps its power over tariffs and preserves separation of power.’

Another Trump-aligned House Republican told Fox News Digital, ‘I think the Supreme Court rightfully decided that this was an Article I authority.’

‘Conservatives don’t like tariffs as a long-term strategy,’ the second House Republican said. ‘The president was right to use them as a tool, and he was right to use them to get outcomes on certain things. But in a long-term way…it’s a tax on consumers.’

The conservative-majority high court ruled on Friday that Trump did not have the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The White House’s interpretation of the 1977 law was used as the basis for sweeping ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs that Trump first unveiled last year.

But Chief Justice John Roberts argued that the law would have more expressly mentioned tariff authority if that is what it was meant for.

Roberts said ‘the president must ‘point to clear congressional authorization’ to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs,’ which ‘he cannot.’

The ruling, and subsequent wave of relief, isn’t the first time Republicans have bucked Trump and his tariffs. The Senate on several occasions has voted against specific parts of the strategy, and the House voted last week to end Trump’s emergency declaration on Canada aimed at ending tariffs there.

‘Article One gives tariff authority to Congress. This was a common sense and straightforward ruling by the Supreme Court. I feel vindicated as I’ve been saying this for the last 12 months,’ Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., one of six House Republicans who voted against the Canada tariffs last week, told Fox News Digital. ‘Besides the Constitutional concerns I had on the Administration’s broad-based tariffs, I also do not think tariffs are smart economic policy. Broad-based tariffs are bad economics.’

One House GOP aide bluntly told Fox News Digital after the ruling, ‘Tariffs suck and are useless.’  

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., one of the most vocal opponents of tariffs in the Senate, contended in a post on X shortly after the ruling that the Supreme Court ‘struck down using emergency powers to enact taxes.’

‘No future administration, including a socialist one, can use ‘emergency’ powers to get around Congress and tax by decree,’ Paul said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

But not every Republican was thrilled by the result, nor their colleagues’ attitude toward the hefty blow dealt to Trump’s agenda and the ripple effect it could have on his economic policies. One Republican source described the outpouring of relief or opposition as ’50/50.’

A GOP Senate source told Fox News Digital, ‘If this is a relief to any Republican, then they clearly don’t care about their president’s agenda.’ 

‘The administration will find a way around this, and should, but anyone who’s celebrating right now is probably missing a part of their brain,’ the source said. ‘I don’t understand how someone can see President Trump and the American people lose trillions of dollars and smile.’

Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Fox News Digital that he was disappointed by the decision, but not surprised, and noted that the court was divided on the issue.

‘President Trump’s tariffs were delivering results — bringing our trading partners to the table, securing ten trade agreements, and driving supply chains and manufacturing back to the United States,’ Marshall said. ‘These tools were also advancing our national security interests, including pressuring countries like India to stop purchasing Russian oil.’ 

A third House Republican granted anonymity to speak candidly told Fox News Digital the Supreme Court decision was ‘a severe blow’ because the tariffs ‘were making progress that we finally have on fair trade.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Previous Post

Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling rejecting sweeping tariffs powers: ‘A disgrace’

Next Post

Bill, Hillary Clinton to be deposed in New York for House Oversight Epstein probe

Next Post
Bill, Hillary Clinton to be deposed in New York for House Oversight Epstein probe

Bill, Hillary Clinton to be deposed in New York for House Oversight Epstein probe

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Starbucks to pay about $35M to NYC workers to settle claims it violated labor law

Starbucks to pay about $35M to NYC workers to settle claims it violated labor law

December 3, 2025
Coinbase stock flips crucial support level as losses jump: can it hit $100?

Coinbase stock flips crucial support level as losses jump: can it hit $100?

February 13, 2026
Saks files for bankruptcy as luxury market struggles

Saks files for bankruptcy as luxury market struggles

January 15, 2026
Bondi confirms DOJ has received criminal referral alleging Brennan perjury over Steele dossier

Bondi confirms DOJ has received criminal referral alleging Brennan perjury over Steele dossier

February 11, 2026
S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

0
Apple’s AI chief abruptly steps down

Apple’s AI chief abruptly steps down

0
Trump Media to merge with nuclear fusion company

Trump Media to merge with nuclear fusion company

0
Warner Bros. Discovery rejects Paramount’s amended takeover offer

Warner Bros. Discovery rejects Paramount’s amended takeover offer

0
S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

March 13, 2026
Rivian stock forecast: Wyckoff theory points to long‑term rebound

Rivian stock forecast: Wyckoff theory points to long‑term rebound

March 13, 2026
Iran war is breaking your portfolio: here are 5 ways to fix it

Iran war is breaking your portfolio: here are 5 ways to fix it

March 13, 2026
COWZ stock: Is it safe to buy this dividend ETF dip?

COWZ stock: Is it safe to buy this dividend ETF dip?

March 13, 2026

    Get Smarter with Your Money – Sign Up for Free Financial Tips!


    Join our community of savvy savers and investors! By signing up, you'll receive weekly emails packed with personalized financial tips, budgeting hacks, and investment strategies tailored to your income level. Take control of your finances today – it’s free and only takes a minute!

    Recent News

    S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

    S&P 500 index and VOO stock crash may have more downside, chart shows

    March 13, 2026
    Rivian stock forecast: Wyckoff theory points to long‑term rebound

    Rivian stock forecast: Wyckoff theory points to long‑term rebound

    March 13, 2026
    Iran war is breaking your portfolio: here are 5 ways to fix it

    Iran war is breaking your portfolio: here are 5 ways to fix it

    March 13, 2026
    COWZ stock: Is it safe to buy this dividend ETF dip?

    COWZ stock: Is it safe to buy this dividend ETF dip?

    March 13, 2026
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: FinancialTradeFreedom.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 financialtradefreedom.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Investing and Stock News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Thank you

    Disclaimer: FinancialTradeFreedom.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 financialtradefreedom.com | All Rights Reserved