Financial Trade Freedom - Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Financial Trade Freedom - Investing and Stock News
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Schumer moves to force Senate to take legal action against DOJ, Trump admin over Epstein doc dump

admin by admin
December 22, 2025
in News
0
Schumer moves to force Senate to take legal action against DOJ, Trump admin over Epstein doc dump
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Senate Democrats are mounting a legal offensive against the Trump administration for its handling of the release of files and materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has teed up the first salvo. 

Schumer on Monday announced that he would file a resolution that would compel the Senate to take legal action against the Trump administration for ‘illegally refusing to release the complete Epstein files and heavily redacting the files that are released.’ 

‘The law Congress passed is crystal clear: release the Epstein files in full, so Americans can see the truth,’ Schumer said in a statement. ‘Instead, the Trump Department of Justice dumped redactions and withheld the evidence — that breaks the law. Today, I am introducing a resolution to force the Senate to take legal action and compel this administration to comply.’

Schumer’s move comes just days after the Department of Justice (DOJ) dumped several hundred thousand documents and photos from its trove of materials related to the late Epstein. Schumer and Senate Democrats warned ahead of the document dump on Friday that unless the DOJ fully complied with the recently passed law, they would seek legal action.

They argue that Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ didn’t follow the law, which Congress passed nearly unanimously out of both chambers last month.

Schumer, who forced a successful vote in the Senate on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, previously argued that the ‘heavily redacted documents released by the Department of Justice today is just a fraction of the whole body of evidence.’

‘Simply releasing a mountain of blacked-out pages violates the spirit of transparency and the letter of the law,’ Schumer said in a statement. ‘For example, all 119 pages of one document were completely blacked out. We need answers as to why.’

The law required that the DOJ release all unclassified records related to Epstein, his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, known associates and entities linked to Epstein and Maxwell, internal DOJ decision-making on the Epstein case, records on destroying or tampering with documents, and all documents on his detention and death.

There were narrow exceptions to what the government could opt against releasing, including materials that reveal victims’ identities or medical files, child sex abuse materials, information that could jeopardize active investigations, images of graphic death or injury, or classified national security information.

Schumer and congressional Democrats, along with some congressional Republicans, were already peeved that the DOJ wasn’t going to dump every document in its possession by Friday’s deadline.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that day that the agency would be taking a phased approach and said he expected ‘that we’re going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks,’ as the DOJ worked to comb through every document to ensure ‘every victim, their name, their identity, their story, to the extent it needs to be protected, is completely protected.’

But it was the inclusion of several heavily redacted documents without explanation as to why they were blacked out that raised lawmakers’ eyebrows.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who also is the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that Friday’s release ‘could have been a win for survivors, accountability, and transparency to the public. It wasn’t.’

He accused the Trump administration of breaking the law with how it handled the document dump and vowed that the Judiciary Committee would investigate.

‘Senate Judiciary Democrats will investigate this violation of law and make sure the American people know about it,’ Durbin said in a statement. ‘The survivors deserve better. It’s clear Donald Trump and his Republican enablers are working for the rich and powerful elites — and not you.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Previous Post

‘No way’ Walz administration was unaware of Minnesota fraud scandal, Emmer says

Next Post

Lawsuit claims security cameras sold in the US carried undisclosed surveillance risks

Next Post
Sanders blasted after blocking bipartisan kids’ cancer research bill: ‘Grinch,’ ‘selfish’

Sanders blasted after blocking bipartisan kids’ cancer research bill: ‘Grinch,’ ‘selfish’

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Cross-Currency Swap: Definition, How It Works, Uses, and Example

Cross-Currency Swap: Definition, How It Works, Uses, and Example

February 19, 2025
How to Trade Options on Robinhood

How to Trade Options on Robinhood

February 19, 2025
How Companies Use Derivatives To Hedge Risk

How Companies Use Derivatives To Hedge Risk

February 19, 2025
Settlement Price: Definition, Use in Trading, and Example

Settlement Price: Definition, Use in Trading, and Example

April 5, 2025
Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

0
How to Open a Swing Trade Account

How to Open a Swing Trade Account

0
How to Trade 0DTE Options

How to Trade 0DTE Options

0
How to Trade Options on Webull

How to Trade Options on Webull

0
Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

January 14, 2026
Tesla stock plunges on Wednesday: why Elon Musk’s latest move may backfire

Tesla stock plunges on Wednesday: why Elon Musk’s latest move may backfire

January 14, 2026
Brazil’s Ibovespa rises on polls and US data as global risks weigh

Brazil’s Ibovespa rises on polls and US data as global risks weigh

January 14, 2026
Europe bulletin: BoE targets non-bank risks, Arctic tensions rise, UK SFO probes bribery

Europe bulletin: BoE targets non-bank risks, Arctic tensions rise, UK SFO probes bribery

January 14, 2026

    Get Smarter with Your Money – Sign Up for Free Financial Tips!


    Join our community of savvy savers and investors! By signing up, you'll receive weekly emails packed with personalized financial tips, budgeting hacks, and investment strategies tailored to your income level. Take control of your finances today – it’s free and only takes a minute!

    Recent News

    Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

    Climate activists press BP, Shell on post-peak oil finance strategy shift 2026

    January 14, 2026
    Tesla stock plunges on Wednesday: why Elon Musk’s latest move may backfire

    Tesla stock plunges on Wednesday: why Elon Musk’s latest move may backfire

    January 14, 2026
    Brazil’s Ibovespa rises on polls and US data as global risks weigh

    Brazil’s Ibovespa rises on polls and US data as global risks weigh

    January 14, 2026
    Europe bulletin: BoE targets non-bank risks, Arctic tensions rise, UK SFO probes bribery

    Europe bulletin: BoE targets non-bank risks, Arctic tensions rise, UK SFO probes bribery

    January 14, 2026
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: FinancialTradeFreedom.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 financialtradefreedom.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Investing and Stock News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Thank you

    Disclaimer: FinancialTradeFreedom.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 financialtradefreedom.com | All Rights Reserved